The U.S. can stop treating the Middle East like an energy lifeline and instead finish the work of securing its own supplies, leaning into domestic production, smarter leasing, and realistic price signals; this piece argues for leaving the region, expanding North American barrels, confronting hostile chokepoints with a clearer strategy, and protecting gains from a future administration that might reverse them. It lays out how Canada, Mexico, and Venezuela, along with stepped-up U.S. output, can tilt the balance toward true material independence. It also warns that politics in blue states and federal lands remain the biggest obstacles to locking this in.
We should stop pretending the Middle East problem is one we are destined to solve forever and start treating it like a problem we can leave behind. Energy security is not vague foreign policy idealism; it is a practical logistics game about barrels, routes, and refineries. With the right mix of permits, infrastructure, and market discipline, dependence on distant sea lanes can be reduced sharply.
The recent drumbeat of policy changes has a pattern: campaign talk turned into emergency measures, then into deregulatory pushes and targeted diplomacy to boost imports from friendly hemispheric suppliers. Those moves matter because America still consumes far more physical barrels than it produces. Counting BTUs is neat on a spreadsheet, but what keeps trucks, factories, and airlines running is actual crude and refined product hitting U.S. docks and pipelines.
STEVE MOORE: FIVE ENERGY TRUTHS THE MEDIA IGNORE AS AMERICA’S OIL BOOM BLUNTS THE IRAN WAR’S IMPACT
North America already supplies a huge share of our needs: Canada, Mexico, and rising Venezuelan flows combined with domestic output put us close to closing the barrel gap. If Alaska, the Lower 48, and Gulf leases keep moving and drilling efficiencies continue to improve, the physical supply picture looks a lot better than the headlines suggest. That reality gives the U.S. room to stop policing every strait and pipeline on behalf of partners who can afford to pay for their own security.
President Trump put it bluntly when he said, “Let them all do it. What the hell are we doing it for?” That line captures a core argument: European and Asian consumers who rely heavily on Middle Eastern oil should shoulder much more of the cost and risk of protecting those flows. The U.S. can be helpful but should not be the economic and military guarantor of everyone else’s oil access forever.
Two domestic wild cards deserve attention: California and New York. Both demand energy and value environmental priorities, yet both block production in places where hydrocarbons are plentiful. Until those states reconcile policy with reality, they will keep exporting higher costs and lower resilience to the rest of the country, and they will undercut national efforts to reach material independence.
Here are the rubs you can’t paper over with slogans. First, the real floor for economically viable oil is higher than some policymakers admit; production economics, not political cheerleading, determine whether wells keep flowing. Second, political turnover matters: policy returned to the White House can erase gains if future leaders reverse leasing and permitting reforms, so solidifying progress now is urgent.
TRUMP FLOATS A GAS TAX HOLIDAY
If a future administration prioritizes shutting down access to federal acreage, production would slump and the gains we’ve made could vanish quickly. Renewable build-out is essential, but it cannot substitute for the reliable, high-density energy that fossil fuels and nuclear provide, especially when data centers and industrial demand keep climbing. Pragmatism means building everything that works and keeping options open.
Regulatory relief helps operators, but it does not replace the need for reasonable price levels that allow investment in rigs, pipelines, and refineries. Cheap oil can be damaging just as costly oil can be destabilizing; the goal is a steady middle where companies invest, workers get jobs, and consumers are not crushed by wild swings. Those market signals, paired with policy that favors production on federal and private lands, are how independence becomes lasting.
The opportunity window is real and closing. With geopolitical friction around chokepoints like the Strait of Hormuz and with hemispheric partners increasing their flows, the U.S. can finally pivot away from being dragged into every clash abroad. Acting now with more leasing, higher rig counts, and completed infrastructure projects is the pragmatic conservative course to secure American energy and reduce the need for endless foreign entanglement.
