In a recent broadcast, conservative commentator Pete Santilli sounded the alarm on what he perceives as a grave threat to the United States. During his show, Santilli discussed the infiltration of American society by forces intent on undermining its core values and economic stability. His dialogue with co-host Deb Santilli touched upon historical instances of radical activism and painted a dire picture of future threats.
Santilli began by recalling an anecdote about “Steve from Philadelphia,” a terminally ill individual who was part of what he called the “propane tank brigade”. In which Americans would run down Pennsylvania Avenue with propane taks strapped to their backs while carrying lit road flares. While the concept was intended to be humorous, it underscores Santilli’s point that many Americans feel unheard and are driven to drastic thoughts due to perceived governmental overreach.
“We need to be able to have a discussion,” said Pete Santilli. He emphasized the lack of leadership in addressing post-election concerns, particularly regarding President Trump’s potential loss. According to Santilli, there is an expectation that if Trump loses, it will not be through fair means but rather through manipulation and psychological operations designed by those in power.
Deb Santilli echoed these sentiments, noting that such tactics have been ongoing for decades. The conversation turned towards President Joe Biden’s recent public appearance, which they described as torturous and indicative of broader systemic issues within current leadership.
One significant concern raised was economic control. Pete and Deb discussed how figures like Al Gore have historically attempted to shift economic power away from traditional industries like oil towards new schemes such as carbon taxes under the guise of combating climate change. “The whole climate change thing is literally a means by which they can grab from those that were controlling the New World Order,” Pete asserted.
This sentiment reflects a broader belief among right-leaning individuals that efforts toward environmental regulation are less about saving the planet and more about redistributing wealth and control. They argue that these policies are economically illiterate and designed to weaken America’s global standing while enriching a select few who push these agendas.
Moreover, Deb pointed out how proponents of socialism claim America can transition smoothly into communism because of its inherent greatness—a concept she vehemently disagrees with. She warned that such transitions always involve significant suffering before any purported benefits materialize—benefits she believes will never come under socialist regimes.
The conversation also touched upon digital currency control efforts led by figures like Chuck Schumer and Jerry Nadler. The fear expressed was clear: federal control over digital currency could lead to unprecedented government surveillance and economic manipulation—a direct threat to personal freedoms cherished by Americans.
Finally, Pete posed an essential question: would any American accept being controlled by a small group under communism? His rhetorical inquiry aimed at highlighting how unacceptable such an outcome would be for anyone who values freedom and democracy—a sentiment likely shared across political divides when framed in terms this stark.
In conclusion, Pete Santilli’s broadcast serves as a clarion call for vigilance against what he sees as insidious attempts to undermine America’s foundational principles through both overt actions and subtle policy shifts. For many right-leaning Americans tuning in, his message resonates deeply with their fears about losing their country’s identity amidst growing calls for radical change
