On a recent phone call with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), conservative commentator Pete Santilli exposed alarming incompetence and potential corruption within the agency. The conversation, which has since gone viral, highlighted the FDA’s dismissive attitude towards alternative COVID-19 treatments and raised serious questions about their affiliations with foreign corporations convicted of terrorism.
Santilli began by confronting an FDA employee about the agency’s suppression of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. “I became an ivermectin smuggler,” Santilli declared, frustrated by what he perceives as governmental overreach in restricting these potentially life-saving drugs.
The core of Santilli’s concern was his discovery about hypochlorite acid—a substance he claims can kill SARS-CoV-2. According to Santilli, when companies tried to share this information based on National Institutes of Health (NIH) scientific papers, they were threatened with shutdowns by the FDA. “Tell Fauci he can kiss my keister,” Santilli exclaimed, vowing to defy what he called “scumbags” at the FDA who are allegedly preventing Americans from accessing effective treatments.
As if that wasn’t enough, Santilli dropped another bombshell: Ericsson Corporation’s control over critical emergency communication systems in America. He accused Ericsson—a company twice convicted for material support of terrorism—of controlling cellular triangulation used in medical alert devices. “Did you know that a foreign corporation controls your system?” he asked incredulously.
Despite these grave allegations, the FDA employee remained largely unresponsive or ignorant about these issues. When pressed on whether their systems are controlled by Ericsson or iConnective—a subsidiary implicated in aiding terrorists—the employee could only offer vague reassurances that their system is “totally wrong in America.”
Santilli didn’t stop there; he questioned how many people had died due to government-mandated COVID protocols like remdesivir administration. He cited data suggesting remdesivir caused severe side effects leading patients onto ventilators, often resulting in death. The FDA employee admitted knowing people who had died from COVID but seemed unfazed by Santilli’s claim that remdesivir was responsible for many fatalities.
The conversation took a darker turn when it became clear that private-public partnerships might be enabling such negligence or worse—collusion with entities hostile to American interests. “We have private entities for profit working with government entities aligning with corporations convicted of terrorism,” said Santilli.
This explosive call underscores a disturbing trend: federal bureaucrats appear either unaware or indifferent to significant threats posed by their policies and affiliations. As patriotic Americans who value transparency and accountability from our institutions, we must demand answers.
Why is our government suppressing information about alternative COVID treatments? Why are they partnering with foreign corporations convicted of supporting terrorism? And most importantly, why does it seem like those entrusted to protect us are more interested in protecting their profits?
These questions need immediate answers—not just for Pete Santilli but for every American citizen concerned about our nation’s health security and sovereignty.
In conclusion, this phone call serves as a wake-up call for all American-loving patriots who vote Republican: It’s time we hold our agencies accountable before more lives are lost due to incompetence or deliberate malfeasance within our own borders.
