The United States faces a clear, urgent test: rising electricity demand from data centers, advanced manufacturing and artificial intelligence must be met with reliable, affordable power so the country can compete with China and safeguard its economy and security. This piece argues for a demand-driven, source-neutral energy policy that removes political favoritism, speeds permitting and tax rules that spur investment, and supports a broad mix of generation to keep lights on and industries humming.
Technology is changing how much power we need and how fast we need it. Artificial intelligence, sprawling data farms and the electrification of heavy industry are sending electricity demand sharply upward, and that trend will only accelerate as more software and chips drive innovation. If America wants to lead in the next wave of technology, we need abundant, cheap electricity on a reliable grid.
China is moving aggressively to expand its energy infrastructure, and that matters for competition. A nation that can generate lots of affordable electricity will attract factories, semiconductor fabs and AI data centers that want stable, predictable costs. Winning this race doesn’t come from slogans — it comes from making energy an asset, not a liability.
Washington should let demand set the agenda rather than trying to pick winners from the start. Recent years saw federal policy tilt toward select technologies through mandates and subsidies, which raised costs and slowed projects. Reorienting policy to meet real electricity needs creates a predictable environment for investment and keeps the grid resilient when global shocks happen.
WHAT TRUMP’S RATEPAYER PROTECTION PLEDGE MEANS FOR YOU
The old approach delivered higher bills and slower permitting just when new generation was needed most. Building new power plants and upgrading transmission require clear rules, faster reviews and a tax code that rewards investment instead of penalizing it. Without that, communities can struggle to attract the data centers and factories critical for modern growth.
The current administration has pushed to expand domestic oil and natural gas production and to cut red tape for energy infrastructure. Agencies were told to prioritize permitting and speed environmental reviews so projects can move forward without needless delays. Those moves free up traditional sources that provide firm power while newer technologies scale up.
Regulators were also directed to accelerate licensing for next-generation nuclear technologies, including small modular reactors. These factory-built units promise faster deployment and lower upfront costs than legacy projects, and they can deliver dependable baseload power for industrial customers. Supporting nuclear innovation is about practical reliability, not ideology.
TRUMP DIRECTS MILITARY TO STRIKE NEW DEALS WITH COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS: ‘GOING TO BE BUYING A LOT OF COAL’
One of the most consequential changes came in tax policy with the Working Families Tax Cut Act, which restored 100 percent bonus depreciation for capital investments. That simple tweak lets companies deduct the full cost of major projects right away and makes large energy and industrial investments far more financially attractive. Faster depreciation can tip the scale for new factories, grid upgrades and the energy infrastructure needed to power them.
When companies can count on solid tax treatment, they are more willing to build the plants and data centers that create jobs and demand power. Several major developers recently committed to covering electricity costs tied to their new facilities so local taxpayers or utilities don’t shoulder sudden spikes in demand. That kind of private investment eases the burden on communities and speeds economic growth.
TRUMP TROUNCES BIDEN ENERGY RECORDS IN JUST MONTHS AS ADMIN CELEBRATES 1 YEAR OF ‘HISTORIC GAINS’: DATA
Encouraging domestic manufacturing matters just as much as encouraging generation. We have become too dependent on foreign supply chains for critical energy components, especially from China, and domestic investment helps restore those supply lines. A tax and regulatory climate that rewards building here will bring back factories that make turbines, panels, batteries and reactor parts.
Expanding domestic energy supply is a national security imperative as much as an economic one. Abundant natural gas and more onshore generation reduce vulnerability to foreign disruptions, while a revival of nuclear and domestic solar manufacturing further strengthens resilience. A diverse mix of sources reduces the risk that any single geopolitical flashpoint can sever our power lifeline.
Critics will say rolling back targeted subsidies hurts renewable growth, but a neutral, market-driven approach lets the fastest, most economical projects win. Developers naturally favor technologies that can be deployed quickly when demand climbs, and that often benefits solar and fast-build solutions. Policy should remove barriers, not replace one set of favorites with another.
Lawmakers and regulators should stick to concrete steps: keep tax rules that accelerate investment, clear permitting backlogs, promote domestic manufacturing and protect consumers from price shocks. Acting on those priorities will let markets and innovators deliver the supply needed to meet demand and keep America competitive in an energy-hungry world.
