Spreely +

  • Home
  • News
  • TV
  • Podcasts
  • Movies
  • Music
  • Social
  • Shop
  • Advertise

Spreely News

  • Politics
  • Business
  • Finance
  • Technology
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Finance
  • Technology
  • Health
  • Sports
Home»Spreely Media

Lorex Sued Over Alleged CCP Links To Baby Monitors

Dan VeldBy Dan VeldJune 18, 2026 Spreely Media No Comments4 Mins Read
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Missouri’s attorney general accuses a major camera maker of hiding ties to the Chinese regime while selling baby monitors and home security gear, and the state is suing to hold the company accountable. The case says the manufacturer kept supply lines and software links to a Chinese firm once tied to Beijing’s surveillance apparatus, even after a 2022 sale. Texas filed a similar suit earlier, and both states say consumers and retailers were not told the full story. The legal fights focus on deception, national security, and protecting families from hidden foreign access to intimate home feeds.

Lorex, known for selling indoor and outdoor WiFi cameras and baby monitors, is at the center of the controversy. The complaint argues customers trusted these products to protect children and homes, not to expose private moments to a foreign power. ‘These cameras watch our babies breathe.’ That line has sharpened political attention and pushed state officials into court.

The roots of the dispute trace back to a 2018 acquisition by Dahua Technology and reporting that tied company leadership to Communist Party structures. Critics say Dahua’s tech was used in broader Chinese surveillance efforts in the years after that deal. Missouri’s filing points to those connections to explain why continued technical links would be alarming for American families and the nation’s security.

Although Lorex was sold in 2022 to a Taiwanese buyer for tens of millions, Missouri alleges that the relationship with Dahua never fully ended. Hanaway made the matter personal and pointed, stating in the press release: “The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world. Missouri will not allow the CCP to put its hand on our cradles,” and framed the lawsuit as a defense of parental privacy. That rhetoric underlines the Republican view that government should step in when private companies let foreign adversaries into our homes.

The complaint also describes firmware and supply-chain claims, and it includes a direct allegation that rates at the heart of the concern. Hanaway alleged that Lorex’s firmware routes straight to Dahua, “further evidencing CCP involvement and control over device hardware and software.” States say that type of backdoor access would let outside actors reach live feeds and stored footage without adequately informing consumers or retail partners.

See also  Pro-Life Movement Demands National Minimum Life Standard

Beyond the technical allegations, Missouri’s suit accuses the company of selling through major retailers without disclosing the relationship with a firm the Department of Defense once flagged as a security risk. The filing seeks restitution for consumers and damages intended to punish deceptive practices. These claims aim to make buying a product a matter of clear public information rather than a blind trust in a brand name.

The legal remedies on the table are specific: Missouri sues under the state Merchandising Practices Act and asks for up to $1,000 back for each affected buyer over the last five years, plus roughly $1.8 million in additional damages. Texas, through its attorney general, filed a parallel suit earlier alleging violations of its Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Together these cases represent a coordinated state-level response to perceived threats from foreign-linked technology.

State officials are pitching this as a straightforward protection of families and American sovereignty. They argue regulators and prosecutors must act when companies fail to disclose ties that create real surveillance risks at the scale of bedrooms and nurseries. From a conservative perspective, it is about defending private life from hostile powers and demanding transparency from American retailers and manufacturers.

Lorex has not issued a public statement for these lawsuits, and the company did not respond to requests for comment at the time the filings were reported. In the meantime, the legal process will test how aggressively states can use consumer protection laws to cut off hidden channels between U.S. homes and foreign entities. The cases will be watched closely by parents, retailers, and anyone worried about where their home video streams really go.

https://x.com/AGCHanaway/status/2066537674874249380

News
Avatar photo
Dan Veld

Dan Veld is a writer, speaker, and creative thinker known for his engaging insights on culture, faith, and technology. With a passion for storytelling, Dan explores the intersections of tradition and innovation, offering thought-provoking perspectives that inspire meaningful conversations. When he's not writing, Dan enjoys exploring the outdoors and connecting with others through his work and community.

Keep Reading

Kennedy Presses Toxicology Reports For Full Disclosure

Protect US AI Edge, Block High-End Chip Exports To China

GOP Must Fund Reconciliation 3.0, Rebuild Missile Stockpiles

Cardinal Reasserts Catholic Influence In Public Life, Blocks IVF

Preston Davey Murder Exposes Institutional Failures, Demands Reform

Trump Capitalizes On Years Of Ignored Voter Anger, Now

Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

All Rights Reserved

Policies

  • Politics
  • Business
  • Finance
  • Technology
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Finance
  • Technology
  • Health
  • Sports

Subscribe to our newsletter

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
© 2026 Spreely Media. Turbocharged by AdRevv By Spreely.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.