I lay out why the recent strikes against Iran were the right call, what those strikes accomplished, how Tehran is already shifting tactics to survive, and the six concrete steps that must follow to turn a temporary advantage into permanent security.
President Donald Trump made a hard choice to strike the Islamic Republic, and it changed a dangerous trajectory. For years Tehran advanced its nuclear program, expanded missile forces and backed regional terror while brutalizing critics at home. The strikes halted that steady growth and forced the regime onto the defensive in ways that hesitation never would have.
The damage was not merely symbolic. Iran’s nuclear facilities took hits, missile inventories and production sites were degraded, and senior operatives were removed from the field. Those losses matter because they shrink Tehran’s options and buy time for pressure to work, but they do not finish the job. A one-off blow can blunt a threat, but it cannot eliminate an ideology or a state’s capacity to rebuild.
How the conflict ends matters far more than the initial strikes. If the war is simply paused, Iran gains the time it needs to rebuild, reconstitute forces and claim survival as proof of strength. Tehran already seems intent on turning pain into leverage, shifting from direct confrontation to tactics that raise costs for everyone else.
One clear lever is the Strait of Hormuz. Iran knows how to disrupt shipping, roil energy markets and use uncertainty as bargaining power, and we see those signals now. Rather than offering a real off-ramp, Tehran appears to be testing whether the United States wants a durable result or just a truce that leaves the regime intact.
Inside Iran many citizens are less concerned about short-term escalation than about regime survival. The pattern Tehran has followed for decades is patience: absorb pressure, wait out political cycles abroad, and re-emerge stronger when the time is right. That gives the regime a dangerous cushion unless its core structures are genuinely broken.
The Islamist leadership’s ideological resilience sets it apart from ordinary states. Systems that tolerate pain for ideological ends can endure sanctions, bombings and losses in ways democracies typically do not. That means measured pressure must turn into decisive disruption of the institutions that enable brutality and aggression.
MIKE POMPEO: OPERATION EPIC FURY IS RIGHTEOUS — AND REGIME CHANGE MUST FOLLOW
Stopping now hands Tehran a second chance to recover. If the goal is to neutralize the long-term threat, policy must move from battlefield success to strategic collapse of the regime’s capacity to wage war and bankroll terror. That requires a focused set of measures, not vague promises of diplomacy.
First, Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile should be removed from the country. As long as the material sits inside Iran, the nuclear problem is postponed, not solved. Taking the stockpile out eliminates the latent capability that has fueled years of fear and brinkmanship.
Second, the military campaign must target ballistic missile arsenals, launchers and the factories that produce missiles and drones. Knocking out those production chains is the only way to prevent a rapid rearmament. This is not about symbolic damage; it is about denying Tehran the hardware to threaten the region again.
Third, the Strait of Hormuz must be reopened and secured by force if necessary, not left to negotiation with a regime that has already weaponized maritime chokepoints. The ability to threaten global shipping cannot be allowed to return as a bargaining chip. Security of transit must be nonnegotiable.
Fourth, Tehran’s oil revenue streams need to be constrained so the government cannot fund military recovery and internal repression. Cut the hard currency and you cut the regime’s ability to buy back influence and armaments. Economic pressure must remain a tool until the regime’s incentives change.
Fifth, sustained pressure on the regime’s leadership network is essential to break the chain of command and the aura of untouchability that shields it. Target political and military leaders whose removal undermines centralized control and encourages popular momentum for change. Disrupting command structures forces the system to fracture.
Sixth, the security forces that terrorize Iranian citizens must be degraded and held accountable. Hitting checkpoints and units that repress dissent sends a message the regime understands: terrorizing your own people will not protect you. Those who enforce brutality should no longer act with impunity.
If the United States presses these objectives, the current advantage can become lasting. The regime is weakened and exposed now, and that window should not be squandered on temporary pauses that let Tehran rebuild. Unfinished wars rarely die quietly; they return under worse conditions if the underlying threat survives.
