Incoming Border Czar Tom Homan delivered a scathing response to Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) after she mocked his immigration expertise during a recent interview. Crockett, a vocal critic of Homan’s approach, appeared on MSNBC’s Alex Witt Reports on Saturday, where she dismissed his qualifications and claimed he was clueless about illegal immigration.
“We have someone (Homan) who doesn’t know what he’s doing,” Crockett said, referring to Homan’s upcoming role under former President Trump’s second term. “You have Trump that goes out there, him and his minions, who say things like, ‘you know what, we’re only going to get rid of the bad ones,’ right?”
Crockett argued that immigration enforcement under Trump’s policies could create fear and upheaval for immigrant families. Her comments quickly drew sharp criticism, culminating in Homan’s fiery rebuttal during an appearance on Newsmax TV’s Wake Up America on Monday.
Homan, a seasoned veteran with over three decades of experience in immigration enforcement, wasted no time dismantling Crockett’s remarks. Responding to a clip of her comments, he questioned her knowledge and understanding of the immigration crisis.
“Well, look, I’ve forgotten more about this issue than she’ll ever know,” Homan said bluntly. “For God’s sake, I’ve been doing this for 34 years.”
Homan highlighted what he described as a “rude awakening” for Democrats and their immigration policies: the results of the November election. “That rude awakening was the November election,” he said. “The American people are sick of an open border.”
Homan didn’t stop at discrediting Crockett’s expertise. He shifted the focus to the real-world consequences of what he calls failed border policies. Asking a series of hard-hitting questions, Homan underscored the human toll of illegal immigration:
- “How many young women have to be raped, murdered, and burned alive?”
- “How many MS-13 and Tren de Aragua members must invade our major cities and commit crimes against U.S. citizens?”
- “How many angel moms and dads do we have to meet who lost their children at the hands of someone who wasn’t supposed to be here?”
These questions, according to Homan, highlight the urgent need for stricter border enforcement to protect both American citizens and migrants from harm.
Crockett’s claims that Homan “doesn’t know what he’s doing” stand in stark contrast to his decorated career in immigration enforcement. Homan served as the Executive Associate Director of ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations under both the Trump administration and the Obama-Biden regime. In 2015, he was awarded the Presidential Rank Award, a prestigious honor recognizing exceptional service in federal government roles.
Homan’s tenure has been marked by a commitment to curbing illegal immigration and promoting national security, though his hardline stance has often drawn criticism from progressive lawmakers like Crockett.
Homan concluded his appearance with a final jab at Crockett’s intelligence and reaffirmed his and Trump’s commitment to border security. “So look, I don’t know who this lady is. Apparently, she’s not real smart, but she can say what she wants,” he said.
“President Trump is going to secure this border and save lives—not just American lives but the lives of migrants, too,” Homan added.
Crockett’s comments and Homan’s fiery rebuttal underscore the ongoing political divide over immigration policy. For Republicans like Homan, open borders represent a crisis threatening national security and public safety. Democrats, on the other hand, argue that strict immigration policies often perpetuate fear and injustice for immigrant communities.
As Homan prepares to take on his new role as border czar under Trump’s leadership, the immigration debate is likely to grow even more contentious. With Crockett and other progressives maintaining a staunch opposition to his policies, Homan’s tenure promises to be anything but uneventful.
The broader implications of this exchange extend beyond personal attacks and political sparring. The U.S. continues to grapple with the challenges of balancing border security, humanitarian concerns, and the economic contributions of immigrants.
As policymakers on both sides of the aisle weigh in, the public will remain deeply invested in the outcomes. Whether through fiery rhetoric or substantive policy changes, the debate over immigration will undoubtedly remain a central issue in American politics.
For Homan, the path forward is clear: enforce the law, secure the border, and protect lives. For his critics, including Crockett, the challenge lies in proposing alternative solutions that address these goals while adhering to progressive ideals. The clash of ideologies is far from over, but one thing is certain—immigration will remain a defining issue in the political arena.
