Spreely +

  • Home
  • News
  • TV
  • Podcasts
  • Movies
  • Music
  • Social
  • Shop
    • Merchant Affiliates
  • Partner With Us
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Finance
  • Technology
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Finance
  • Technology
  • Health
  • Sports

Spreely +

  • Home
  • News
  • TV
  • Podcasts
  • Movies
  • Music
  • Social
  • Shop
    • Merchant Affiliates
  • Partner With Us
  • Home
  • News
  • TV
  • Podcasts
  • Movies
  • Music
  • Social
  • Shop
    • Merchant Affiliates
  • Partner With Us

Spreely News

  • Politics
  • Business
  • Finance
  • Technology
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Finance
  • Technology
  • Health
  • Sports
Home»Spreely Media

McEnany Urges Republicans To Nuke Filibuster To Fund Troops

David GregoireBy David GregoireNovember 6, 2025 Spreely Media No Comments4 Mins Read
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Kayleigh McEnany urged Republicans to scrap the filibuster for spending measures to force a reopening of the government and protect military pay and public safety. She pressed the case hard on cable, arguing Democrats are blocking straightforward votes that would keep paychecks flowing and air travel safe. The debate pits urgency for funding against Senate norms, and Republican leaders are split on whether to change the rules.

McEnany laid out her argument plainly on a panel and didn’t mince words about the stakes. “Let me propose a very simple solution here. Filibuster, not in the Constitution. Filibuster, not passed legislatively. Filibuster can be removed for the sole purpose of spending bills. You can just remove the filibuster to open the government,” McEnany said. “When military members are hurting, when we are not safe in the skies, it is time to nuke the filibuster for spending bills because Democrats are hurting our country.”

She returned to the human costs repeatedly, pointing to service members and essential personnel who are missing paychecks. “Let me make this really simple. No one’s winning. Not Republicans, not Democrats. When military members cannot pay their bills, when air traffic controllers are calling out because they get zeros on their paycheck, when our safety is at issue in the skies, no one is winning,” McEnany said. Her tone framed the shutdown as a practical failure that demands immediate fixes, not procedural purity tests.

McEnany also highlighted the voting record to show where she believes blame lies, calling out Democrats who declined to back partial measures. “We are all losing. And why? Because Democrats, they got a chance to vote to pay the military. Fine, you don’t want to open up the government? How about pay the military essential workers?” That argument is designed to force a choice: protect the troops now or defend a tactic at the cost of people’s livelihoods.

She spelled out the narrow number of Democrats willing to support paying the military, using it to embarrass the opposition and push pressure onto wavering senators. “Three. John Fetterman, Raphael Warnock, and Jon Osoff. Three Democrats voted to pay the military. Now John Kennedy says, ‘Let’s vote to remove our pay until military members get paid.’ Can’t wait to see how many Democrats vote on that.” McEnany framed the showdown as a test of priorities rather than partisan theater.

See also  House Democrats Abandon Impeachment Push Against Trump

Republican voices pushed back against changing Senate practice even while sympathizing with the urgency McEnany described. “The filibuster forces us to find common ground in the Senate. Power changes hands, but principles shouldn’t,” Republican Utah Sen. John Curtis on X. That line captures the institutional argument: breaking rules for short-term gain can come back to bite a future majority.

House leadership also warned about long-term costs if the filibuster were tossed on a whim, arguing stability matters even in crisis. “The filibuster has traditionally been viewed as a very important safeguard,” Johnson said. “If the shoe was on the other foot, I don’t think our team would like it.” Those comments show the tension between doctrine and immediate action, and they explain why many GOP senators remain cautious.

The dispute boils down to two competing priorities: safeguard Senate norms or force votes to solve a shutdown’s immediate harms. McEnany and like-minded conservatives view procedural change as a legitimate emergency tool when lives and national security are affected. Opponents fear that removing the filibuster on principle will weaken the Senate’s role as a moderating force.

For now, the fight centers on optics and leverage as both sides try to shape public opinion and pressure holdouts. Republicans sympathetic to McEnany’s pitch see an opportunity to expose Democratic votes that leave troops unpaid, while institutionalists warn of unintended consequences. Either way, the debate makes clear that a purely procedural rule is now front and center in a political tug-of-war with real-world consequences.

WATCH:

https://x.com/SenJohnCurtis/status/1984234593248248281

News
Avatar photo
David Gregoire

Keep Reading

Weight Loss Drugs Fraud, Trump Must Crack Down Now

ICE Targets Minneapolis Somali Welfare Fraud, Federal Probe Intensifies

Comer Threatens Contempt For Clintons Over Epstein Subpoena Evasion

Charlie Kirk Murder Case Exposes Defense Limits, Secrecy Risks

Lee Strobel Defends Christian Miracles in New Documentary

Border Patrol Chief Confirms ICE Will Deport Kilmar Abrego Garcia Soon

Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

All Rights Reserved

Policies

  • Politics
  • Business
  • Finance
  • Technology
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Finance
  • Technology
  • Health
  • Sports

Subscribe to our newsletter

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
© 2025 Spreely Media. Turbocharged by AdRevv By Spreely.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.