FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino recently shared startling revelations about an ongoing Deep State investigation. In his words, the information uncovered has left him deeply unsettled. “I’ll never be the same after learning what I’ve learned,” Bongino stated on social media platform X.
Bongino emphasized the need to eliminate public corruption and the political misuse of law enforcement and intelligence. The integrity of the Republic, he noted, depends on addressing these issues. He pledged a thorough and lawful investigation, ensuring that the truth prevails.
Dan Bongino reiterated his commitment to transparency during his FBI tenure. He assured the public that, although certain matters may not be visible, significant actions are underway. Bongino and the Director are united in their mission to end corruption and politicization.
Bongino’s full statement reveals his dedication to conducting investigations by the book. He promised an honest effort to uncover the truth, not subjective interpretations. “Not ‘my truth,’ or ‘your truth,’ but THE TRUTH,” he declared.
Amid these developments, former ODNI Tulsi Gabbard made waves by declassifying a pivotal presidential briefing. This document suggests that Barack Obama was aware that the Trump-Russia collusion narrative was a fabricated hoax. The implications are profound, highlighting a manipulation of intelligence.
The declassified report points fingers at John Brennan and other Obama-era figures. They allegedly crafted a misleading Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) to sway public perception. According to the report, Obama directly influenced the intelligence narrative.
Recent declassifications under DNI Tulsi Gabbard have shed light on these actions. The July 2025 documents include oversight reports and press releases scrutinizing the ICA’s creation. These revelations offer a deeper understanding of the political maneuvering involved.
The HPSCI report reveals Brennan’s controversial role in the ICA’s publication. Despite warnings from seasoned CIA officers about its quality, Brennan pushed forward. He dismissed objections, suggesting that the Steele dossier, though questionable, “rings true.”
The ICA’s claims about Putin’s preference for Trump lacked solid evidence. Intelligence indicating Putin’s neutrality or Clinton preparations was disregarded. Only scant, unverifiable fragments supported the narrative of Russian interference favoring Trump.
Brennan’s actions were reportedly directed by Obama during a key Oval Office meeting. This directive led to the inclusion of dubious reports, bypassing standard intelligence protocols. The report accuses Brennan of misleading lawmakers about the dossier’s use.
DNI PR-18-25 revelations accuse Brennan and intelligence leaders of crafting a false narrative. They are said to have suppressed contradictory information, rendering their claims implausible. Brennan ignored officers who noted the absence of direct evidence linking Putin to Trump’s election.
In a December 2016 memo, Brennan asserted a consensus on Russian interference. This consensus, however, was reportedly based on selective intelligence and minimal analysis. Senior officials, including Brennan, unusually directed the ICA’s creation.
The DNI PR-15-25 revelations highlight a crucial December 9, 2016, White House meeting. It was here that Obama allegedly directed the ICA’s creation to outline Russian election influence. The release hints at Brennan’s involvement in what is termed a “treasonous conspiracy.”
The report implies a concerted effort to undermine Trump’s presidency through manipulated intelligence. Brennan’s actions, driven by presidential directives, raise serious questions about integrity. The revelations call for accountability and transparency in intelligence operations.
As these events unfold, the commitment to uncovering the truth remains steadfast. The American public deserves transparency and accountability from its leaders. The investigations promise to shine a light on the shadows of the Deep State.
