President Trump abruptly ended trade negotiations with Canada after an Ontario government ad used a montage of Ronald Reagan’s voice to attack tariffs, sparking a sharp reaction from the White House and the Reagan Foundation. The dispute centers on whether the ad misrepresents Reagan’s original remarks and whether Canada’s move was political interference aimed at U.S. courts. The administration framed tariffs as vital to national security and the economy, arguing the ad crossed a line. The decision shuts down talks and raises questions about how allies handle messaging against U.S. trade policy.
The provincial ad, paid for by Ontario’s government, aired on major U.S. networks and stitched Reagan’s words into an argument against tariffs. Ontario Premier Doug Ford announced the spot online, writing, “Using every tool we have, we’ll never stop making the case against American tariffs on Canada. The way to prosperity is by working together.” That public push on a key U.S. policy irritated Washington and put a spotlight on cross-border political pressure.
President Trump reacted sharply on his platform, making his position unmistakable and using forceful language about the stakes. “They only did this to interfere with the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, and other courts. TARIFFS ARE VERY IMPORTANT TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY, AND ECONOMY, OF THE U.S.A,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform late Thursday. “Based on their egregious behavior, ALL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS WITH CANADA ARE HEREBY TERMINATED.” That move immediately froze high-level talks and signaled a zero-tolerance stance toward perceived meddling.
Ford’s post and the ad prompted a response from the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute, which said the commercial “misrepresents” Reagan’s 1987 radio address on trade. The foundation noted Ontario did not request permission to use or alter the recording and said it was reviewing legal options. The foundation’s objection framed the controversy as not just political but legal and ethical, elevating the dispute beyond ordinary diplomacy.
The clip itself splices Reagan’s original remarks but omits important context about selective use of trade tools, which the foundation and others flagged as misleading. Reagan’s authentic lines included this passage: “When someone says, ‘let’s impose tariffs on foreign imports’, it looks like they’re doing the patriotic thing by protecting American products and jobs. And sometimes, for a short while it works, but only for a short time.” The ad’s edit choices removed balance that might have tempered the message and left viewers with a one-sided impression.
Since returning to office, the Trump administration has applied tariffs on Canadian aluminum, steel, automobiles and lumber, arguing these measures protect U.S. manufacturing and national security. The policy has drawn legal scrutiny and is now headed to the Supreme Court, which will hear arguments over the administration’s use of emergency economic authority in November. Supporters in the GOP view the tariffs as necessary leverage to defend American jobs and supply chains against unfair trade practices.
https://x.com/fordnation/status/1978779503213052337
This is not the first time trade talks with Ottawa have been interrupted this year; the president paused negotiations in June after Canada proposed a digital services tax on U.S. tech firms, an action that was quickly reversed. That earlier episode showed how fast tensions can flare and how Ottawa has, at times, stepped back under U.S. pressure. For now, the administration’s posture is clear: perceived political attacks tied to trade will carry consequences, and negotiations will not proceed on terms that appear to undercut U.S. interests.
Canadian officials have not publicly provided a new response to the termination, leaving a diplomatic silence while business groups and lawmakers weigh the fallout. The end of talks will have ripple effects for industries on both sides of the border that had been seeking clearer rules and market access. With the Supreme Court review and public messaging battles ongoing, the path to renewed negotiations looks uncertain and conditional on changes in behavior from Canada’s provincial and federal actors.
