The Lobito Corridor in Central Africa is a strategic chokepoint for cobalt, copper, and other minerals vital to defense and clean-energy tech, and Beijing is racing to dominate it while Washington dithers. This piece argues from a conservative perspective that the United States must treat the corridor like a national security priority and act with speed, capital, and clear industrial policy to prevent Chinese control.
China is not waiting for debates or committees. Its banks and state-linked firms move fast, finance big projects, and secure long-term deals that lock countries into dependency. The result is a near-continuous chain of influence across Africa that channels raw materials through Chinese-controlled processing and shipping networks. If left unchecked, that chokehold will shape the manufacturing base of the United States for decades.
const observer = new MutationObserver((mutations) => { const adDivToHide = document.querySelector(“#dailycaller_incontent_1”); if (adDivToHide && dc_noads_page) { adDivToHide.classList.add(“hide-premium”, “hide-free”); observer.disconnect(); console.log(“Ad div found and hidden”); } }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
The Lobito Corridor runs from the Atlantic port of Lobito through Angola into Zambia and the Democratic Republic of Congo, and it crosses the heart of the region that supplies the world with cobalt and copper. Those minerals are not trivia: they are the guts of batteries, semiconductors, grid storage, and the components that keep our military and power grid resilient. Control of logistics and processing matters as much as control of the mines themselves.
(new Image()).src = ‘https://capi.connatix.com/tr/si?token=739c4263-c671-4316-b7cf-ecd244900844&cid=9c4d09f1-aa3e-4da1-ad63-362d562ecfad’; cnx.cmd.push(function() { cnx({ playerId: “739c4263-c671-4316-b7cf-ecd244900844” }).render(“59f64f116598417b8d610477330f5a3e”); });
Beijing already dominates processing capacity for cobalt and copper, and that upstream advantage cascades into downstream control of batteries and components. When a single foreign power refines and sets the market rules, U.S. industries and defense suppliers become vulnerable to supply shocks and geopolitical pressure. It is a strategic mistake to view this only through the narrow lens of development aid.
Washington often treats African infrastructure as a charitable or purely commercial issue, announcing intent and then moving slowly. That passive posture plays right into China’s hands, because authoritarian systems can move capital and labor without the delays inherent in our regulatory and political processes. Speed and scale beat promises when leaders in Luanda, Lusaka, and Kinshasa need visible results.
const observer2 = new MutationObserver((mutations) => { const adDivToHide2 = document.querySelector(“#dailycaller_incontent_2”); if (adDivToHide2 && dc_noads_page) { adDivToHide2.classList.add(“hide-premium”, “hide-free”); observer2.disconnect(); console.log(“Ad div2 found and hidden”); } }); observer2.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
Local leaders across Angola, Zambia, and the DRC want partners who build ports, rails, and power at scale. They also want transparent deals and lasting jobs. The United States can provide both standards and muscle—if it chooses to prioritize outcomes and commit real money instead of press releases. If Washington waits, China’s model of bundled financing plus guaranteed offtake will win the day every time.
The stakes are concrete and immediate. Losing influence over this corridor would mean higher risk for American defense supply chains and more leverage for Beijing over critical industries. It would also undercut domestic miners, refiners, and manufacturers that rely on secure, diversified sources of key inputs. This is not abstract geopolitics; it is about the factories and arsenals that keep Americans safe.
const observer3 = new MutationObserver((mutations) => { const adDivToHide3 = document.querySelector(“#dailycaller_incontent_3”); if (adDivToHide3 && dc_noads_page) { adDivToHide3.classList.add(“hide-premium”, “hide-free”); observer3.disconnect(); console.log(“Ad div found and hidden”); } }); observer3.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
Practical, fast measures will be decisive. The United States should deploy capital through its development finance tools, embed reliable American firms into construction and logistics projects, and insist on co-located processing with guaranteed U.S. offtake. Procurement rules and anticorruption safeguards must lock in standards so partners do not drift toward opaque, state-directed deals that prioritize Beijing’s interests.
From a conservative perspective, this is a straightforward strategic choice: back American industry and allies, or accept foreign dependence that undermines our security and competitiveness. The next administration should stop treating mineral corridors as an abstract development problem and start treating them like infrastructure on par with harbors and canals. Move fast, use leverage, and don’t apologize for defending American resilience.
