They were curious about the number of individuals who would adhere to a total overhaul of their lives without any scientific basis, but rather random and sometimes absurd directives.
I have consistently asserted that Covid-19 was intentionally initiated by a select few in the globalist elite for the sole purpose of testing the waters for the impending technocratic new world order.
Now, the World Economic Forum has essentially acknowledged that this was indeed the motive behind the Covid-19 “pandemic.”
The WEF enthusiastically shared the following excerpt on its website’s “My Carbon” page, promoting the concept of smart cities, also known as 15-minute cities. The WEF outlines three essential “developments” necessary for the realization of their vision of “smart and sustainable cities,” with the first one being adherence to limitations on personal freedom.
1. COVID-19 was the test of social responsibility – A huge number of unimaginable restrictions for public health were adopted by billions of citizens across the world. There were numerous examples globally of maintaining social distancing, wearing masks, mass vaccinations and acceptance of contact-tracing applications for public health, which demonstrated the core of individual social responsibility.
The purpose of Covid was to test our willingness to sacrifice individual freedom and sovereignty by conforming to a “new normal” filled with seemingly absurd restrictions.
It raised questions about the inconsistency of safety measures, such as allowing shopping at big stores but not small businesses, or attending certain establishments while prohibiting essential activities.
The implication from the WEF is that compliance with a more authoritarian global order is necessary for sustainability, discouraging questioning or logic in favor of blind obedience.
Would we comply with absurd new laws and regulations, such as being required to wear face coverings to combat an alleged aerosolized virus, maintaining a six-foot distance in public, and receiving an unprecedented mRNA gene-based injection?
They claimed it was for our own good, so just roll up your sleeve and don’t question it. Those who dared to ask were at risk of losing their jobs and being shunned by society. Many lost friends and even close family members due to this coercive “experiment” of our willingness to blindly follow orders.
Nearly five years later, the World Economic Forum, arguably one of the most influential nonprofit public-private partnerships, acknowledges that it was all a test of our compliance and celebrates the fact that most of us failed (or excelled, depending on one’s perspective).
They sought to ascertain how many people would demonstrate their adherence to the lawless, fascistic beast system by complying with “unimaginable restrictions,” many of which were arbitrarily created without any scientific evidence supporting their contribution to public health.
The top health official in the U.S. government, Dr. Anthony Fauci, recently acknowledged that there was no scientific basis for his decision to mandate a six-foot social distancing requirement for Americans.
They were curious to see how many of us would demonstrate loyalty to the “authorities,” whether they were people in white coats or in formal attire.
The Covid-19 beta test once again demonstrated the accuracy of the Milgram Experiment, conducted by Yale University professor Stanley Milgram between 1961 and 1962.
The experiment revealed that a large majority of Americans would comply with an unjust law or command if it came from an official authority figure.
Shockingly, 65 percent of Americans would reluctantly disregard their own moral compass and obey the order, even if they knew it would lead to the death of an innocent person.
From Wikipedia:
Beginning on August 7, 1961, a series of social psychology experiments were conducted by Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram, who intended to measure the willingness of study participants to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts conflicting with their personal conscience. Participants were led to believe that they were assisting an unrelated experiment, in which they had to administer electric shocks to a “learner.” These fake electric shocks gradually increased to levels that would have been fatal had they been real.
The experiments found, unexpectedly, that a very high proportion of subjects would fully obey the instructions, with every participant going up to 300 volts, and 65% going up to the full 450 volts. Milgram first described his research in a 1963 article in the Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology[1].
