Over the past four years, Joe Biden has repeatedly emphasized the importance of a peaceful transfer of power. However, as President-elect Donald Trump prepares for his return to the White House, questions loom over whether he will receive the same smooth transition that Biden once championed.
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
Despite Trump’s resounding electoral victory, early signs suggest he may face significant resistance from within the government. This opposition, which goes beyond anonymous bureaucratic sabotage, includes prominent figures like Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, who recently reminded the military to obey only “lawful orders.” Critics interpret this as a preemptive swipe at Trump’s plans.
Trump’s sweeping reform agenda has already put the entrenched military bureaucracy on edge. During his first term, the former president frequently clashed with top military officials, who were often celebrated by the media for pushing back against his directives. Among the most notable incidents was General Mark Milley’s alleged decision to instruct subordinates to disregard Trump’s orders following the January 6th, 2021, Capitol riot.
Determined to avoid a repeat of such insubordination, Trump has tapped Army veteran and Fox News personality Pete Hegseth to lead the Department of Defense. Hegseth, a staunch Trump ally, is expected to spearhead efforts to root out what Trump describes as “woke” ideology within the military’s upper ranks.
Trump’s bold proposals include utilizing the military to carry out mass deportations of illegal immigrants and invoking the Insurrection Act to address internal unrest. While the Insurrection Act has been used in the past, most recently during the 1992 Los Angeles riots, Trump’s critics argue his plans go too far, accusing him of seeking authoritarian control. Some former generals who served under Trump have gone as far as labeling him a “fascist” and warning against what they view as an alarming expansion of presidential power.
Reports suggest that Trump’s plans are already sparking unease within the Pentagon. High-ranking military officials, wary of what they see as a potential clash with their constitutional duties, are reportedly holding informal discussions on how to respond to the president-elect’s directives. According to CNN, one anonymous official emphasized that troops are legally obligated to disobey unlawful orders, fueling concerns about preemptive defiance of Trump’s authority.
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin’s recent remarks on the legality of military orders have further fanned the flames. Critics, including Trump ally Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR), view Austin’s comments as an attempt to delegitimize Trump’s presidency before it even begins. Cotton, a strong advocate of deploying the military to quell unrest, penned a sharply worded letter to Austin accusing the Pentagon of undermining civilian control of the armed forces.
In his letter, Cotton condemned what he described as “partisan obstructionists” within the Department of Defense who are seeking to defy Trump’s constitutional authority. He blasted Austin for making “baseless” insinuations about Trump’s intentions, arguing that such rhetoric undermines the military’s apolitical nature.
“It appears that partisans and obstructionists inside the Department of Defense are laying groundwork to defy or circumvent President Trump’s plans for both military and civil-service reform,” Cotton wrote. He warned that these actions not only erode civilian oversight of the military but also challenge the constitutional framework of government itself.
While acknowledging that such tactics are “annoying” and “inappropriate,” Cotton expressed confidence that they would ultimately fail. He stressed that no action by the outgoing administration could limit Trump’s constitutional powers as commander-in-chief, adding that the Pentagon’s resistance only underscores the necessity for reform.
The emerging tension between Trump’s administration and the military raises significant questions about the state of civil-military relations in the United States. The principle of civilian control over the armed forces has been a cornerstone of American democracy since its founding. However, growing partisanship and ideological divides threaten to destabilize this delicate balance.
Critics of Trump argue that his aggressive rhetoric and plans for the military risk further politicizing an institution that has traditionally remained above the fray. On the other hand, Trump’s supporters contend that resistance within the military establishment reflects a troubling trend of insubordination and bureaucratic overreach.
As Trump prepares to take office, the stakes are high for both his administration and the military. The coming months will likely reveal whether the Pentagon’s unease represents genuine concern for legal and ethical principles or a broader effort to thwart the president-elect’s agenda. Either way, the unfolding clash is sure to have far-reaching implications for the presidency and the nation’s armed forces.
