As the Democratic Party scrambles to find a viable candidate for the 2028 presidential election, speculation is already running rampant. While there is still ample time before an official nominee is selected, the left is struggling to rally behind a leader who can unite their increasingly fractured base. The Democratic establishment, often mocked as the Party of Enforced Insanity, appears more disorganized than ever, and their latest floated contender is raising eyebrows.
At the moment, Vice President Kamala Harris leads in early polling, but the enthusiasm behind her is anything but strong. The disastrous 2024 campaign cycle left many Democrats disillusioned, and Harris’s consistent failures in leadership—whether it was her handling of the border crisis or her humiliating public gaffes—have left the party searching for a so-called savior. Enter the New York Times, which has predictably jumped in to push a new, radical alternative: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
Ocasio-Cortez, the self-proclaimed champion of “progressivism,” has long been a lightning rod for criticism due to her extreme policy positions and frequent displays of economic illiteracy. Despite being a sitting congresswoman, she often appears to lack even a basic understanding of how government functions. Yet, the mainstream media, desperate to prop up their latest left-wing darling, has begun constructing the narrative that she is the future of the Democratic Party.
The Times’ recent glowing profile of Ocasio-Cortez presents her as a bold new leader for progressives, conveniently omitting the numerous scandals, missteps, and out-of-touch policies that have defined her political career. The publication goes as far as to compare her to Bernie Sanders, praising her as the ideological heir to his socialist vision. But let’s be clear: what they call “progressivism” is nothing more than a repackaged push for government overreach, economic redistribution, and an authoritarian-style rule masked under the guise of social justice.
If Ocasio-Cortez were to run in 2028, her policies would be her downfall. She has consistently advocated for a socialist economic model, openly supporting ideas like the Green New Deal—an economically devastating plan that would cripple American industry, cost trillions of dollars, and eliminate millions of jobs in the name of climate alarmism. She has also called for the abolition of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), effectively endorsing open borders at a time when illegal immigration remains one of the most pressing national security threats.
Beyond policy, Ocasio-Cortez has become infamous for her immature antics, from claiming that using a gas stove is a threat to democracy to embarrassing herself in public debates. Even members of her own party privately admit that her inability to handle criticism and her tendency to play the victim make her an unserious leader. AOC’s political rise has been fueled more by social media clout than real legislative accomplishments, a reality that should concern any voter who values experience and competence.
The fact that the left is even considering Ocasio-Cortez as a serious presidential contender speaks volumes about the Democrats’ internal crisis. The party has moved so far left that even figures like Kamala Harris—who once championed radical policies—are now viewed as too centrist. The old Democratic coalition of working-class voters and moderates has collapsed, replaced by a group obsessed with identity politics, climate extremism, and government dependence.
Even within her home state of New York, AOC’s influence has waned. While Barack Obama once dominated her district, recent elections have shown a slow but steady erosion of Democratic support. Voter frustration with crime, inflation, and high taxes—issues she consistently fails to address—could spell trouble for her if she attempts a national campaign.
From a strategic standpoint, conservatives might welcome an Ocasio-Cortez candidacy. Her extreme positions would alienate working-class voters, suburban moderates, and even some within the Democratic establishment who fear that a socialist on the ballot could spell disaster.
Former President Donald Trump and other Republican leaders have already proven that candidates who embrace American values—economic freedom, law and order, and limited government—can triumph over radical leftist ideology. If AOC were to face off against a strong conservative opponent, her brand of socialism would likely lead to a landslide defeat.
The New York Times’ endorsement of AOC should come as no surprise. For years, the mainstream media has acted as an extension of the Democratic Party, promoting figures who align with their progressive agenda while demonizing conservatives. The Times’ attempt to position Ocasio-Cortez as a serious presidential candidate is just another example of how disconnected the media elite are from real American voters.
While conservatives see through this charade, many within the Democratic base still buy into the media’s manufactured narratives. However, the cracks are beginning to show. The party’s inability to rally behind a competent, electable candidate proves that they are in deep trouble ahead of 2028.
Whether or not Ocasio-Cortez actually launches a presidential bid remains to be seen. She may continue using her political platform as a means to build her personal brand rather than actually running for higher office. However, if the Democratic Party does decide to embrace her as their 2028 nominee, it could very well mark the beginning of the party’s greatest electoral disaster in modern history.
America has already rejected radical leftist policies. The failures of the Biden-Harris administration have made that clear. The question now is whether Democrats will continue down the path of extremism or finally come to their senses. If they choose Ocasio-Cortez, they will be handing Republicans a golden opportunity to reaffirm America’s commitment to freedom, prosperity, and common sense.
